Screener
XMHQ vs SPHQ
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
Key differences
- SPHQ costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPHQ is significantly larger than XMHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPHQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XMHQ | SPHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.2B | $17.3B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +14.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 12.69% |
| Max drawdown | -36.90% | -31.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XMHQ and SPHQ
Explore further