Screener
FSGS vs MMLG
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.24% less per year.
- MMLG is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; MMLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MMLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | MMLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $88M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.30% | 18.13% |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -45.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSGS and MMLG
Explore further