Screener
FSGS vs ILCG
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
Key differences
- ILCG costs 0.57% less per year.
- ILCG is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ILCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ILCG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2017 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.0% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +27.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.5% | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.30% | 16.38% |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -35.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSGS and ILCG
Explore further