Screener
FSGS vs SGRT
First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
Key differences
- FSGS follows a index tracking strategy; SGRT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSGS | SGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.61% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | — |
| Since | 2017 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | — |
| Max drawdown | -43.25% | -17.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FSGS and SGRT
Explore further