Screener
FSMD vs ABFL
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF vs Abacus FCF Leaders ETF
Key differences
Both FSMD and ABFL are equity ETFs. FSMD charges 0.15% a year and ABFL 0.49%. The main difference: FSMD follows a index tracking strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- FSMD follows a index tracking strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- FSMD costs 0.34% less per year.
- FSMD is much larger than ABFL. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ABFL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FSMD | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.4B | $520M |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 0.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.6% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.69% | 16.02% |
| Max drawdown | -40.67% | -34.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.