Screener
FTCS vs RONB
First Trust Capital Strength ETF vs Baron First Principles ETF
Key differences
- FTCS costs 0.47% less per year.
- FTCS is significantly larger than RONB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTCS follows a index tracking strategy; RONB uses active selection.
- FTCS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTCS | RONB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $388M |
| Since | 2006 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.93% | -13.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTCS and RONB
Explore further