Screener
FTGS vs ACSG
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.11% less per year.
- FTGS is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTGS follows a index tracking strategy; ACSG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTGS | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $15M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.99% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTGS and ACSG
Explore further