Screener
FTGS vs GSGO
First Trust Growth Strength ETF vs Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.15% less per year.
- FTGS is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTGS follows a index tracking strategy; GSGO uses active selection.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTGS | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $163M |
| Since | 2022 | 1999 |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.99% | -13.88% |
Similar to FTGS and GSGO
Explore further