Screener
GSGO vs FSGS
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.16% less per year.
- GSGO is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $29M |
| Since | 1999 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -43.25% |
Similar to GSGO and FSGS
Explore further