Screener
FTLS vs FSCS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF vs First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSCS costs 0.78% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than FSCS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTLS is classified as alternative, while FSCS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FTLS follows a long short strategy; FSCS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FTLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTLS | FSCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $58M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +11.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.19% | 13.01% |
| Max drawdown | -20.54% | -43.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTLS and FSCS
Explore further