Screener
FTLS vs FSGS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
- FSGS costs 0.77% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTLS is classified as alternative, while FSGS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- FTLS follows a long short strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FTLS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTLS | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $29M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.19% | 15.30% |
| Max drawdown | -20.54% | -43.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTLS and FSGS
Explore further