Screener
FTLS vs XNAV
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.11% less per year.
- FTLS is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FTLS follows a long short strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FTLS | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $31M |
| Since | 2014 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.91% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.19% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -20.54% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FTLS and XNAV
Explore further