Screener
FUMB vs SUB
First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF vs iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
Both FUMB and SUB are fixed income ETFs. FUMB charges 0.29% a year and SUB 0.07%. The main difference: FUMB follows a active selection strategy; SUB uses index tracking.
- FUMB follows a active selection strategy; SUB uses index tracking.
- SUB costs 0.22% less per year.
- SUB is much larger than FUMB. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FUMB | SUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $231M | $11.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 2.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | -0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.78% | 1.00% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -9.46% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.