Screener
SUB vs MEAR
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.19% less per year.
- SUB is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SUB follows a index tracking strategy; MEAR uses active selection.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | MEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 2.87% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.1% | +3.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.0% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.4% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.39 | -0.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.00% | 0.86% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -2.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SUB and MEAR
Explore further