Screener
FVAL vs IWN
Fidelity Value Factor ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.09% less per year.
- IWN is significantly larger than FVAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FVAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FVAL | IWN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $13.4B |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.56% | 1.49% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.71% | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -37.26% | -46.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FVAL and IWN
Explore further