Screener
FXP vs FLCH
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 vs Franklin FTSE China ETF
Key differences
- FLCH costs 0.76% less per year.
- FLCH is significantly larger than FXP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FXP follows a inverse strategy; FLCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FLCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FXP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FXP | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $282M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 2.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | -29.4% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -17.7% | -4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.91% | 19.14% |
| Max drawdown | -94.71% | -62.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FXP and FLCH
Explore further