Screener
FXP vs XPP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
Key differences
- FXP is classified as equity, while XPP is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
- FXP follows a inverse strategy; XPP uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FXP | XPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $11M |
| Since | 2007 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.39% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | cryptocurrency |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.4% | -8.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -29.4% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -17.7% | -19.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.91% | 38.82% |
| Max drawdown | -94.71% | -89.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FXP and XPP
Explore further