Screener
GAL vs FDAT
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
GAL is a mixed asset ETF, while FDAT is a fixed income ETF. GAL charges 0.35% a year and FDAT 0.78%.
- GAL is a mixed asset fund, while FDAT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GAL covers global markets; FDAT covers North America.
- GAL costs 0.43% less per year.
- GAL is much larger than FDAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $306M | $36M |
| Since | 2012 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.11% | 5.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.1% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.16% | 10.36% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -8.20% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.