Screener
GAL vs FISR
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs State Street Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.15% less per year.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while FISR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; FISR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | FISR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $514M |
| Since | 2012 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +3.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | -0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 4.41% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -20.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and FISR
Explore further