Screener
GAL vs KAT
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 0.40% less per year.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; KAT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $688M |
| Since | 2012 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and KAT
Explore further