Screener
GAL vs RULE
State Street Global Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 1.49% less per year.
- GAL is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAL is classified as alternative, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GAL follows a tactical allocation strategy; RULE uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAL | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $307M | $14M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.18% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.4% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.71% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -28.31% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAL and RULE
Explore further