Screener
RULE vs INKM
Adaptive Core ETF vs State Street Income Allocation ETF
Key differences
- INKM costs 1.34% less per year.
- INKM is significantly larger than RULE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INKM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RULE | INKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.84% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $76M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.88% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.5% | +14.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.69% | 5.98% |
| Max drawdown | -30.48% | -28.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RULE and INKM
Explore further