Screener
GAMR vs GPZ
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.19% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than GAMR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GAMR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GAMR | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $245M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.42% | — |
| Max drawdown | -54.16% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GAMR and GPZ
Explore further