Screener
GBF vs IMTB
iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF vs iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- IMTB costs 0.14% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IMTB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GBF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBF | IMTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $280M |
| Since | 2007 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.76% | 4.46% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.0% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.0% | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.79% | 4.07% |
| Max drawdown | -19.67% | -18.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBF and IMTB
Explore further