Screener
GBUG vs SETM
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- SETM costs 0.25% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than GBUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBUG follows a active selection strategy; SETM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBUG | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $617M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.3% | +139.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +30.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.45% | 44.37% |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBUG and SETM
Explore further