Screener
SETM vs METL
Sprott Critical Materials ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- SETM costs 0.34% less per year.
- SETM is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SETM follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SETM | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $617M | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +139.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 44.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SETM and METL
Explore further