Screener
GBUG vs SIL
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- SIL costs 0.25% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than GBUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBUG follows a active selection strategy; SIL uses index tracking.
- SIL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GBUG | SIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $164M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.55% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.3% | +110.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +48.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 47.45% | 49.93% |
| Max drawdown | -32.10% | -63.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GBUG and SIL
Explore further