Screener
SIL vs SGDM
Global X Silver Miners ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.19% less per year.
- SIL is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SIL follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SIL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SIL | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.3B | $660M |
| Since | 2010 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.12% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +110.6% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +48.8% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.8% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.93% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -63.04% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SIL and SGDM
Explore further