Screener
GDMA vs CGBL
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while CGBL is a mixed asset ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and CGBL 0.33%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while CGBL is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
- CGBL costs 0.42% less per year.
- CGBL is much larger than GDMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $6.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -11.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.