Screener
GDMA vs RULE
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while RULE is a mixed asset ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and RULE 1.84%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while RULE is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; RULE uses active selection.
- GDMA costs 1.09% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than RULE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $16M |
| Since | 2018 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +47.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 22.31% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -30.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.