Screener
GDMA vs CTA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and CTA are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and CTA 0.75%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses managed futures.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; CTA uses managed futures.
- CTA is much larger than GDMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | CTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 5.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 20.33% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -18.07% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.