Screener
GDMA vs IMF
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and IMF are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and IMF 0.65%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
- IMF costs 0.10% less per year.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $304M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 10.60% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -15.10% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.