Screener
GDMA vs FLSP
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and FLSP are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and FLSP 0.65%. The main difference: FLSP costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLSP costs 0.10% less per year.
- FLSP is much larger than GDMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | FLSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $908M |
| Since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 9.11% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -22.75% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.