Screener
GDMA vs MAPP
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
Key differences
GDMA is an alternative ETF, while MAPP is a mixed asset ETF. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and MAPP 0.80%.
- GDMA is an alternative fund, while MAPP is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; MAPP uses active selection.
- GDMA costs 0.05% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than MAPP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | MAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $11M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.76% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 9.58% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -12.92% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.