Screener
GDMA vs PEPS
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Parametric Equity Plus ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and PEPS are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and PEPS 0.10%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; PEPS uses option income.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; PEPS uses option income.
- PEPS costs 0.65% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than PEPS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | PEPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $28M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 13.61% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -9.79% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.