Screener
GDMA vs CCOR
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and CCOR are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and CCOR 1.29%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- GDMA costs 0.54% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $27M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | -3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | -1.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | -2.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 7.22% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -22.99% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.