Screener
GDMA vs QIS
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and QIS are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and QIS 1.21%. The main difference: GDMA costs 0.46% less per year.
- GDMA costs 0.46% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than QIS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | QIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $45M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | -49.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 38.72% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -56.53% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.