Screener
GDMA vs SAMT
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and SAMT are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and SAMT 0.66%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- SAMT costs 0.09% less per year.
- SAMT is much larger than GDMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SAMT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $706M |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.59% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +39.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +28.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 17.31% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -20.57% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.