Screener
GDMA vs XNAV
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
Both GDMA and XNAV are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and XNAV 1.27%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- GDMA costs 0.52% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than XNAV. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $34M |
| Since | 2018 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 0.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +39.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -24.27% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.