Screener
GDMN vs NTSI
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSI costs 0.19% less per year.
- GDMN is classified as equity, while NTSI is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- GDMN covers north america markets; NTSI covers global.
- GDMN follows a index tracking strategy; NTSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GDMN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMN | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $216M | $486M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +93.9% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.8% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 61.26% | 15.02% |
| Max drawdown | -52.82% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDMN and NTSI
Explore further