Screener
GDMN vs NTSX
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSX costs 0.25% less per year.
- NTSX is significantly larger than GDMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDMN follows a index tracking strategy; NTSX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GDMN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMN | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $216M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.62% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +93.9% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +58.8% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.12 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 61.26% | 12.52% |
| Max drawdown | -52.82% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDMN and NTSX
Explore further