Screener
GDOC vs GINN
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
Key differences
- GINN costs 0.25% less per year.
- GINN is significantly larger than GDOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDOC follows a active selection strategy; GINN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GINN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDOC | GINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $206M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.3% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.13 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.51% | 16.09% |
| Max drawdown | -31.01% | -41.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDOC and GINN
Explore further