Screener
GDX vs HAP
VanEck Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.10% less per year.
- GDX is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDX | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27.3B | $316M |
| Since | 2006 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +70.3% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +40.1% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.6% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.00 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.53% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -49.79% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDX and HAP
Explore further