Screener
HAP vs GDXJ
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.11% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAP covers global markets; GDXJ covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | GDXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $8.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +78.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +18.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 49.67% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -57.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAP and GDXJ
Explore further