Screener
GDXJ vs HAP
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.11% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $316M |
| Since | 2009 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.1% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.1% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.67% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDXJ and HAP
Explore further