Screener
HAP vs GDX
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.10% less per year.
- GDX is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAP | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.41% | 0.51% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $316M | $27.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.86% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +46.5% | +70.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.1% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +18.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.90% | 45.53% |
| Max drawdown | -44.14% | -49.79% |
Similar to HAP and GDX
Explore further