Screener
GDXJ vs SGDJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- GDXJ is significantly larger than SGDJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ follows a index tracking strategy; SGDJ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | SGDJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $330M |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 7.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.1% | +91.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.9% | +48.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.1% | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.67% | 48.45% |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -59.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDXJ and SGDJ
Explore further