Screener
GDXJ vs SGDM
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.06% less per year.
- GDXJ is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GDXJ follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, GDXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDXJ | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.52% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.7B | $660M |
| Since | 2009 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +78.1% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.9% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.1% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.67% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -57.78% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GDXJ and SGDM
Explore further