Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GEM vs BBEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

BBEM

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$853M

Key differences

Both GEM and BBEM are equity ETFs. GEM charges 0.35% a year and BBEM 0.15%. The main difference: GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; BBEM uses index tracking.

  • GEM follows a index enhanced strategy; BBEM uses index tracking.
  • BBEM costs 0.20% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, GEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GEMBBEM
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$1.7B$853M
Since20152023
Dividend yield1.85%2.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex enhancedindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+41.2%+40.3%
CAGR 3Y+21.9%+20.3%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.000.92
Volatility 1Y20.62%20.57%
Max drawdown-37.02%-17.42%

Similar to GEM and BBEM