Screener
GEM vs GSLC
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 0.26% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than GEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEM covers emerging markets markets; GSLC covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEM | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $15.0B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.7% | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 11.86% |
| Max drawdown | -37.02% | -33.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEM and GSLC
Explore further